Adoption Network Law Center Adoption Network Law Center Adoption Network Law Center
Pregnant? Click here.
Adoption Network Law Center
Crisis Pregnancy Blog

03/19/06

Using neutral language

Posted by : Heather Lowe in Crisis Pregnancy Blog at 06:48 pm , 448 words, 69 views  
Categories: Issues/debate
I don’t like when people refer to adoption as "the loving option." (Does this mean choosing to parent your child is not a loving act?)

When talking about surrender, I think it’s really important to make sure our words stay away from overly emotional language, such as “Adoption is the loving option,” “Birthmothers are angels performing miracles,” or “You can help make waiting couples’ dreams come true.” While these may be heartfelt and genuine feelings, they are not really appropriate to express during a process as serious as the decision to surrender one’s child. That’s because they tend to slant a woman’s disposition toward a given outcome.

I don’t mean to be hard-hearted, but phrases like "Give a gift to a deserving couple" only serve to obscure the realities of adoption…and they muddy the waters for expectant parents who are considering their options.

Framing the issue in warm and fuzzy terms might make us feel better about the losses that come with adoption, but it certainly doesn’t help the decision-makers to stay rational or look at the facts objectively. And viewing the situation logically is what needs to happen most during the time that expectant parents are weighing the pros and cons of surrendering their parental rights.

SPONSOR

In fact, I see far too much sugar and sentimentality surrounding adoption in general, especially in the advertising that seeks to attract pregnant women to the idea of surrendering. If I were in charge of the world, I’d try to ban adoption advertising, in order to help keep surrenders separate from the business side of adoption.

I’m very uncomfortable with the extent to which adoption has been turned into an industry, with consumers (agencies and waiting couples) trying to market themselves to the producers (pregnant women) using the language and tactics of advertising. I suspect that most hopeful adoptive parents are uncomfortable with this state of affairs, too, and would prefer to avoid selling themselves to potential birthmoms. But they feel they have to do it, because the competition for babies is so fierce, and wait times are so long.

In my perfect world, there would be no matching of pregnant women with waiting couples before birth. Women would have their babies and then decide if they were going to keep them or not. Only then would a licensed agency step in to help find adoptive parents. During the pregnancy, the decision-making process would take place in private, with unbiased counseling not attached to any agency, attorney or facilitator. Then, if an adoption needed to happen, it could do so without the taint of sales tools, such as advertising and marketing.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: terri [Member] Email
Excellent post.
PermalinkPermalink 03/19/06 @ 18:14
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthfamily-search.adoptionblogs.com/
Couldn't agree with you more. I believe that it is so wrong to call pregnant women considering adoption "angels" and imply that they are a selfless, courageous species. Some may be, others may be selfish and trying to take what they may perceive as the "easy way out".

I admire women who are motivated and courageous enough to parent as well. Neither parenting or relinquishing really are an easy path. I have done both and raising a child alone was a billion times easier than relinquishing a child and living with that decision for a lifetime.

All the advertising and intense marketing seems so wrong to me as well. Ditto pre-birth matching - too much potential for hurt for adoptive and birth parents.
PermalinkPermalink 03/19/06 @ 18:26
Comment from: Mary Owlhaven [Member] Email · http://ethiopia.adoptionblogs.com/
Wow!! Great post. Read mine that posted directly before yours. I am amazed at how well they fit together.
Mary/Owlhaven
PermalinkPermalink 03/19/06 @ 18:39
Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
I titled the article I wrote for our local paper (and which I have been quoting in my blog), "Adoption, the loving option", not at all to infer it's better than parenting, but because the alternative here in Seychelles is informal placements that lead to abuse, neglect and a life of servitude for the child. Stepping up and signing off takes guts...and caring. Walking away with no thought to present or future, putting a child in perpetual purgatory because you decide not to decide...ever...is cowardly and selfish.
The part of the world I live in doesn't advertise and there is no adoption industry, so "loving option" is not a marketing slogan.
PermalinkPermalink 03/19/06 @ 20:29
Comment from: Ellen Rardin [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
Thnaks Heather. it will be a great day when we can all lose the Madonna/whore archetype and see birthparents as the real 3dimensional people they are.
PermalinkPermalink 03/19/06 @ 21:11
Comment from: Heather Lowe [Member] Email · http://unplanned-pregnancy.adoptionblogs.com/
Sandra,
I know what you meant. My comments weren't at all directed toward you.

I had been looking at dozens of web pages based in the U.S. And most of them do use the "loving option" in an attempt to recruit pregnant women to place their babies.
Heather
PermalinkPermalink 03/20/06 @ 08:16
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Categories

Misc

Subscribe to Crisis Pregnancy Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 146