Ready for Adoption?
Adoption Network Law Center
Adoption Network Law Center
Want to Adopt? Click here.
Click here to be helped in California!
Adoption Network Law Center
Pregnant? Click here.
Adoption Network Law Center
Crisis Pregnancy Blog

04/14/06

Pre-birth ties between birth and adoptive families

Posted by : Heather Lowe in Crisis Pregnancy Blog at 05:28 pm , 735 words, 70 views  
Categories: Issues/debate
(My apologies for being so terrible about updating this blog this week. The excuse is that I've been travelling, and time has been very scarce.)



How close should you become to the prospective adoptive parents before your baby's birth? There is no easy answer to this question. Even the experts don't agree. Just take a look at these varied points of view. (Trouble with the link? Just go to birthpsychology.com, the home page of the Association for Pre- and Perinatal Psychology and Health. Then find the section on adoption, entitled "The Birth Scene.")

What these people are responding to is an interview between Dr. Marcy Axness and Nancy Verrier, author of the controversial book, The Primal Wound. In the interview, Axness (who grew up in an open adoption) and Verrier (an adoptive mother) are discussing why they feel it isn't right for those in crisis pregnancies to become too close to the potential adoptive parents. Their major objection is that it encourages expectant mothers to emotionally distance themselves from the pregnancy, thus depriving babies of the chance to feel the love of their original mothers while in the womb. They also believe that when the lives of the pregnant mother and the hopeful adoptive mother become intertwined prior to delivery, the potential for coercion skyrockets, since the pregnant parents feel a strong sense of obligation to make the prospective adoptive family's dream of parenthood come true.

SPONSOR
  Adopt in California

I can vouch for both phenomena being real, since both things played out in my own experience. Does this mean it happens in every adoptive relationship? No. However, it is common enough that many adoption experts are worried about the trends toward pre-birth matching, forming ties between the two different types of mothers during the pregnancy, and the issue of prospective adoptive parents being in the delivery room.

It's a delicate balance between allowing people who respect and love each other to get started on their lifelong relationships as soon as possible, and making sure that vulnerable women are not pressured into relinquishing. If one side has to suffer at the expense of the other, though, I'd place the limitations on the first group. Postponing an open adoption relationship for a few months (until after the baby is delivered) would be a small price to pay to ensure that no woman is ever again guilt-tripped or coerced into giving up her baby. Families who honestly want and need an adoption to happen can catch up, but a woman who surrenders against her better judgement does not have the opportunity to go back in time.

It is very common for pregnant women to become overly excited about the relationship they are forming with the adoptive mother-to-be, to the extent that she forgets about her own wants and needs, and/or those of her baby. Why does this happen? For one thing, the adoptive mom may be the only one communicating good feelings about the pregnancy to the woman in crisis. She may also be providing much-needed love and affection. It's hard not to try to please someone who is giving you positive feedback.

And let's not forget, the pregnant woman often has no real idea how she will feel about her motherhood until it arrives, so she is often willing to step back and turn over the reins to the adoptive mom. When the pregnant mother "checks out" and begins to think of herself as "not a mother," she prematurely surrenders her own parenthood. When, during and after birth, the powerful feelings of new motherhood kick in, she may find she's made a mistake. But she now realizes she's made too many verbal commitments to attempt to claim her own child, even if she wants and needs to. How can she deeply hurt the people she's come to like or love? Better to push her own feelings deep down and just stick with the plan. (That's easier than you might think, since she's already been well primed for the idea of "noble sacrifice.")

That is why some believe that adoption professionals ought to discourage any matchmaking between parents in crisis pregnancies and parents who wish to adopt. And that is how they do it in Australia.

Here in the United States, we need to devote more thought to whether we ought to discourage early-forming relationships in adoption, in order to completely avoid the possibility of coercion and lifelong regrets.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Ellen Rardin [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
Hi Heather. I really liked your link. Very interesting and insightful comments. The problem with authors like Marcy Axnes and Nancy Verrier is that they have very extreme viewpoints and have had no practical experience in working with pregnant women and prospective adoptive parents. We can all read the recipe books but getting in the kitchen and cooking is a differnt story altogether!
Many women who are considering adoption seriously are very anxious about where their child is going and exactly what is going to happen. They often express an intense need to know the adoptive parents before birth to put their mind at ease. On the other hand,too early matching and a lack of a buffer zone cause problems.Heres my take on it-allow people to make their own decisons after all their options have been presented and explained. Allow all to have time to process and digest the information. Self determination means you are treating your clients with dignity and respect.
PermalinkPermalink 04/14/06 @ 20:25
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthfamily-search.adoptionblogs.com/
Marcy Axness and Nancy Verrier both are therapists/counselors and do have practical experiences with working with pregnant women and prospective adoptive parents I am fairly certain.

Plus, I believe Marcy is an adoptee and Nancy is an adoptive and bio mother. Their views may seem extreme to you, Ellen, but not to everyone.

The problem with allowing everyone to make their own decisions re pre-birth matching is that many people, including pregnant women, do not see the down side to pre-birth matching. I believe a better solution is to assure them that their babies will be well taken care of after birth no matter what decision they make.


PermalinkPermalink 04/14/06 @ 22:01
Comment from: AdoptionBlogs Editor [Member] Email · http://editor.adoptionblogs.com
Marlou Russell has also written about this - in Hello Before Goodbye http://www.adopting.org/adoptions/hello-before-goodbye-domestic-infant-adoption.html
PermalinkPermalink 04/14/06 @ 22:35
Comment from: Heather Lowe [Member] Email · http://unplanned-pregnancy.adoptionblogs.com/
Ellen, I agree that the men and women considering adoption have an intense need to know the adopting parents. I felt that myself. It is very important to feel that you know the people who are going to be raising your child.

The part of your statement I can't agree with is this: "Heres my take on it-allow people to make their own decisons after all their options have been presented and explained. Allow all to have time to process and digest the information. Self determination means you are treating your clients with dignity and respect."

On the face of it, this sounds great and makes sense. Who doesn't believe in personal responsibility?

But "self-determination" is very difficult in adoption, because surrender is something no woman has experience with until she's done it. She has to make guesses about how you're going to feel, and very often the guesses turn out to be wrong, despite the reading, despite the advice from experts, despite her best efforts at trying to discern how she's going to feel. After a certain point, you have to have experienced it for yourself to know what you are getting into. But most places don't leave time for decisions to be remade after this "Aha" moment.

You can explain and explain what might happen, but that's no substitute for putting conditions in place that minimize the pressure to place.

I realize that there are ethical programs, like yours, that would support a woman in backing out of her plan. But most do not.
PermalinkPermalink 04/15/06 @ 07:05
Comment from: Nicole [Member] Email
"Many women who are considering adoption seriously are very anxious about where their child is going and exactly what is going to happen. They often express an intense need to know the adoptive parents before birth to put their mind at ease."

This is an argument AGAINST pre-birth matching (actually, pre-relinquishment matching), IMHO. I believe that if a woman cannot stand to terminate her parental rights without knowing who the aparents will be, then she shouldn't be relinquishing anyway. Either she truly CAN'T raise her baby, in which case she'll have to surrender no matter whether she knows the APs or not, or she CAN, in which case she probably should.

Furthermore, there are no guarantees that APs are what they appear during the "courting period" of the matching phase. And there are no guarantees APs will live up to their promises, once TPR is complete. No woman should be relinquishing unless she can live with the fact that she might never see her child or the APs ever again... because sadly, it's a very real possibility. If she can't deal with "not knowing" PRIOR to the birth of her baby, what will happen to her if she is cut off from knowing AFTER the birth?

I'm totally against pre-birth matching. Self-determination sounds great, but we DON'T allow it in every instance in this country. Smoking pot is illegal. Doing hard drugs is illegal. Drinking under age 21 is illegal. Why? Because we recognize that these things are detrimental to people. We're willing to sacrifice "self-determination" in order to purport ethical behavior. Why should it be any different in adoption?
PermalinkPermalink 04/15/06 @ 09:04
Comment from: Ellen Rardin [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
I guess what bothers me is the belief , ironically one that social workers have been accused of in adoptions for many years-" we know what is best for you" Assuring pregnant women that "your baby will be well taken care of" is exactly the kind of patronizing statement that really can't be offered ith a straight face when it comes to actually working with women who ask to know the adoptive parents before placment.Again,many people with good ideas don't do adoption,never have and never will. Therefore,their ideas sound good because they do not have to put them into practice.That's exactly how all this comments sound to me.
PermalinkPermalink 04/15/06 @ 10:00
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthfamily-search.adoptionblogs.com/
Marlou Russell does counsel adoptive parents and I think that Marcy and Nancy do as well. They may not facilitate adoptions, but, that doesn't mean that one needs to do that to understand how it should be done "right". They all understand adoption as triad members themselves, and do put their ideas into practice through their counseling potential adoptive parents and birth parents.

I believe that the best way to truly understand adoption is to be a triad member. I respect and admire the way you facilitate adoptions; it sounds as though you do a much better job than most. But, I do think that triad members are capable of understanding the dynamics in a way others just can not totally understand. You come close, but....

PermalinkPermalink 04/15/06 @ 11:17
Comment from: Ellen Rardin [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
Triad members certainly have the intense personal experience I do not have, However,many have a belief that their personal experience makes them experts. They have a tendency to foist their own experience onto other people,they cannot and will not allow other fellow triad members to believe or feel differently from them because it invalidates their own experience that they are pushing.They have such intense and passionate feelings about their own life experiences that they have little objectivity when they are working with clients. This can quite unnerving to people who just want to some basic information or someone to reflect or listen to them without experiencing the other person's story over and over!
PermalinkPermalink 04/15/06 @ 13:04
Comment from: Heather [Member] Email
This is very interesting to me. I have one adopted child where his bmom didn't even contact the agency until after his birth and I have another child where we were matched in the bmom's 8th month and brought him home when he was 9 weeks old.

For me, I preferred when we were matched after the birth. I was not concerned about a change of mind. The second adoption was so very stressful - even though it pretty much went off without a hitch. But the whole unknowing if she was going to change her mind was very (underline very) difficult for me.

With that said and after reading all the comments here, I still would not advocate that all matches should take place after birth. I agree with Ellen. The matching needs to be managed correctly. Every adoption is so different, I really take issue with blanket statements (ie no pre-birth matching).

The more I read here, the more I feel very happy that both agencies we have worked with have been responsible and ethical.




PermalinkPermalink 04/15/06 @ 13:28
Comment from: Nicole [Member] Email
Assuring pregnant women that "your baby will be well taken care of" is exactly the kind of patronizing statement that really can't be offered ith a straight face when it comes to actually working with women who ask to know the adoptive parents before placment.

___

I'm absolutely not advocating saying that to women. What I'm advocating saying is the truth, ie, something like: "Many women feel inherent pressure to place if they're matched pre-birth, therefore, we don't do it. I realize that that makes this all that much harder on you. I'm sorry for that. But you need to know that adoption is never a 100% guarantee that your child will be 'better off,' even if we did allow to match pre-birth with the aparents. So because there's no guarantees anyway, we've decided to eliminate the pressure pre-birth matching can bring, and simply not participate in that system." Not patronizing at all, is it? Actually, it's a LOT more honest than what agencies generally tell bio parents these days. I'd find that MUCH MORE honest than what currently goes on in many agencies, frankly.

______

"Triad members certainly have the intense personal experience I do not have, However,many have a belief that their personal experience makes them experts. They have a tendency to foist their own experience onto other people,they cannot and will not allow other fellow triad members to believe or feel differently from them because it invalidates their own experience that they are pushing.They have such intense and passionate feelings about their own life experiences that they have little objectivity when they are working with clients."

WOW... talk about generalizing. I don't consider myself an "expert" because of my own experience. If anything, my own experience taught me the need for research, for objective studies, etc. I do consider myself well informed, however, because of the research I do (things like talking to other triad members AND adoption professionals, researching other countries' adoption systems, reading scientifically valid and reliable studies, searching out stats, reading up on adoption history trends from reliable sources, etc).

In this particular case, though, who even cares if it's personal experience (by the way, I did NOT match pre-birth) shaping our opinions? Fact is, some women feel pressure from matching pre-birth. Whether that's 1% of women, or 99%, I don't care... because even 1% is too many. So if we can eliminate that pressure, why not do it? So it makes some other women uncomfy... so what? Adoption isn't supposed to be an EASY decision. The more we couch it and make it cushy, the more palatable we make it, the more chances there are that women who don't need to will relinquish.
PermalinkPermalink 04/15/06 @ 19:35
Comment from: Nicole [Member] Email
Oh and just to be clear, I DO NOT think all pre-birth matches work out badly. I do NOT think a woman will always feel pressured, being matched pre-birth. Some pre-birth matches could be fine.

Problem is, some aren't. So, since there is no harm in waiting post-birth to match... and the potential benefits (possibly reducing pressure to place) are great... that is why I think pre-birth matching should be avoided.

Also, I don't think anyone has said this... but if a woman TRULY is uncomfy with not being able to match prebirth, it's not like she has no other options. She can certainly find someone that she already knows to adopt her baby, and do it that way.

It's the agency practice of encouraging e-moms to pick total strangers from a bunch of profiles, pre-birth, that I have huge concerns about.
PermalinkPermalink 04/15/06 @ 19:46
Comment from: kippa herring [Member] Email
"Triad members certainly have the intense personal experience I do not have, However, many have a belief that their personal experience makes them experts."

That's a belief too. As well as a huge generalization. And certainly not an objective opinion.
I must say that the only times I've seen bio-mothers refer to themselves as " experts" has been self-mockingly.

I'm opposed to pre-birth matching, pro strongly encouraging, though not forcing, a woman to see and spend time with her child (taking the child home with her if at all possible, and if not and she's still uncertain about what she wants to do, short term fostering, possibly in a situation where she can visit the child if she wishes).
PermalinkPermalink 04/18/06 @ 09:10
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Categories

Misc

Subscribe to Crisis Pregnancy Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 106