Adoption Network Law Center Adoption Network Law Center Adoption Network Law Center
Pregnant? Click here.
Adoption Network Law Center
Crisis Pregnancy Blog

03/12/06

Fathers' rights in crisis pregnancy

Posted by : Heather Lowe in Crisis Pregnancy Blog at 03:53 pm , 476 words, 184 views  
Categories: Issues/debate
It isn’t just women who are affected by crisis pregnancy. Men are involved too.

That’s why I view this news as a depressing step in the wrong direction for everyone involved in crisis pregnancy. It’s yet another erosion of fathers’ rights.

(If you have trouble with the link, the article is called "Supreme Court upholds adoption" by Rob Moritz of the Arkansas News Bureau.)

Basically, what the article says is this: the Arkanasas Supreme Court has ruled that “a woman who has had no contact with the father of her baby since the night the child was conceived does not have to notify the father or receive his consent before putting the baby up for adoption.”

(I’m not sure what this means in situations where the couple does stay in touch, but I'm not optimistic that fathers have any more rights in that case.)

SPONSOR
  Adopt in California

The state says that putative father registries are enough to uphold fathers' rights. Putative father registries require that men to register as the father of the child before they can be notified if a child believed to be theirs is adopted. If you don’t register, you don’t have a right to know—or so says the state.

This is very backwards, and completely denigrates the role of a father in a child’s life. We tell people that having an active and caring father is so very important to a child, then we pass laws that make it difficult for those who want to parent to stay informed and involved. It doesn't make sense.

Ladies, how would you feel if you had to register with the state every time you had sex that might have resulted in a child? How would you feel if the man had ultimate and complete control over what happened to your child?

It’s true that many men in crisis pregnancies get scared and run. It’s true that many of them just don’t want to be involved (or think they don’t at the time). But there are plenty of men who do want a shot at parenting their child, and who would make fine parents. Often, they are simply not told of a pregnancy. This makes it easier for an adoption to happen, because it eliminates the possibility that the father might object to the plan. However, in cases when a father is not informed and does object, it creates a situation that is ripe for the adoption to be overturned. And that is good for no one.

I say it’s time to update our outdated notions of “legitimacy” and start giving natural parents equal rights. A pregnancy is created by two people and deeply affects both parties. It isn’t fair to trample the rights of men in our zeal to allow adoptions to go forward.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Julie Crowley [Member] Email · http://stepparent.adoptionblogs.com/
I agree with you. As an adoptive stepparent I have seen the pain that a child goes through when a parent doesn't take interest in being a parent. I just finished an article with "it takes two to make it, it should take two to raise it!" Trying to make it easier to push a parent out of a child's life isn't doing any of those children any good at all!
PermalinkPermalink 03/12/06 @ 15:51
Comment from: angelsmom [Member] Email
Putative Father Registries (which now exist in 25-30 states) baby dump laws, and the alleged promises of confidentiality made to bithmothers are all RUSES by the National Council For Adoption to increase adoption agency business. All of these measures PRETEND to protect birthparent rights when in fact they do just the opposite.

No constitionally protected right - especially one as precious as parenthood - requires special efforts to protect it. A father who proves his paternity via DNA and wants to care for his child should be enough!

These registries violate parental rigths and are very harmful to children. Thye are based on the PRESUMPTION that birthparents are bad and any stranger is better...or anyone with money to pay fees is better...and thus deny children a loving caring parent and their biological heritage and roots, in favor of strangers.

Mirah Riben, author
"shedding light on...The Dark Side of Adoption"

www.MirahMirah.com
PermalinkPermalink 03/13/06 @ 10:25
Comment from: jklaren [Member] Email
Putative fathers registries are a short cut designed to make it easier to terminate a father's rights. Adoption agencies, adoptive parents, benefit greatly from this, but the promise that it balances the rights of the father (and the right of the child to have a father) is a sham.

Ask any man if he knows what a putative father registry is, and I would bet most don't. That's pretty flabberghasting, considering it is crucial to protect their rights in case a child of theirs is going to be placed for adoption.

In this age with varied forms of effective birth
control (not just condoms), it is reasonable for a man (or woman) to
believe that sex did not lead to pregnancy. Putative father
registries presume that the father knows about the baby AND that the
mother is intending to place the child for adoption. They also
perpetuate the myth that birth mothers have such frequent sexual
encounters with indiscretion that they cannot identify or locate the
father, when that is pretty rare.

Instead of registires, states should require fathers to be given timely notice by personal service of summons.
Period. No short-cuts.

I am not persuaded when they cry that it is too difficult or costly to
identify or locate the fathers to serve them. They don't want to.
Parental rights are constitutionally protected. It should be hard to
terminate them.

If putative father registries must exist, then they should be widely
publicized, and there should be a duty on those adopting or placing a
child for adoption to inform the father about the specific steps he must
take to protect his interest in keeping and raising the child. In too
many cases, the father's ignorance of the registry is exploited.
PermalinkPermalink 03/15/06 @ 14:35
Comment from: Heather Lowe [Member] Email · http://unplanned-pregnancy.adoptionblogs.com/
"the right of the child to have a father"

A very important point. Putative father registries run right past this in an effort to make the child available for adoption.
PermalinkPermalink 03/16/06 @ 06:43
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Categories

Misc

Subscribe to Crisis Pregnancy Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • thomasbro
  • Guest Users: 153