Ready for Adoption?
Adoption Network Law Center
Adoption Network Law Center
Want to Adopt? Click here.
Click here to be helped in California!
Adoption Network Law Center
Pregnant? Click here.
Adoption Network Law Center
Crisis Pregnancy Blog

05/02/07

Do you feel like a surrogate?

Posted by : Heather Lowe in Crisis Pregnancy Blog at 01:11 pm , 524 words, 137 views  
Categories: Issues/debate


Today I want to talk about a phenomenon I’ve often observed but don’t fully understand. It’s the belief of some pregnant women that they are mere vessels, carrying this baby on behalf of someone else.

I can certainly relate to the feeling that perhaps your parenthood wasn’t meant to be, but I don’t follow to the next step of diminishing your ties to the child you are carrying. Women who take this position appear very at peace and unconflicted about the relinquishment choice. They seem to view themselves as surrogates, intended to give life but not be an ongoing part of that life. You hear them saying things like, “She was meant to be the Johnsons’ child; I just brought that reality to life” or “He was always their baby; I just helped it happen.”

(On the adoptive parent side, adoptive mom Rosie O’Donnell once infamously expressed this notion to her kids this way: “God put you in the wrong tummy.”)

SPONSOR
  Adopt in California

Speaking of God, this way of thinking is often connected to religious belief, but I’m not entirely sure why. I’m a believer myself, and I never for one second felt that my child was meant for someone else.

Maybe that’s because the “vessel” mindset reminds me too much of Margaret Atwood’s A Handmaid’s Tale, which, if you’ve never read it, is all about the idea of women bearing children on behalf of others. (The novel also has a ritual conception scene that will completely gross you out.) Something in me really dislikes the idea that I underwent a time of great pain and struggle in order to make another woman’s dream come true. And call me self-important, but I will never discount my own everlasting value to my child.

In the end, I suppose it’s a matter of whatever mental strategy gets a woman through a difficult time. We all deal with things in different ways, so I’m not going to object to someone’s personal views on what their relinquishment meant to them, even when they are views I don’t understand. But what I do object to – heartily – is agencies or facilitators that consciously encourage this kind of detachment.

You cannot surrender what is not yours. And maybe that’s the point – agencies know it’s easier to sign the papers if you don’t view the baby as your own in the first place. Agencies that lack a strong sense of ethics build on that in order to guarantee that the papers get signed.

Maybe women who minimize their connection to their child will continue to feel that they were nothing more than a surrogate, throughout their entire lives. But I worry about those who do come to realize their own connection to their child – after it’s too late. And I will always strenuously object to any agencies or facilitators that encourage women to think of this baby as “for Mr. and Mrs. X.” Whether a woman raises her child or not, that child is always hers, though perhaps someone else’s as well.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Coley S. [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
"You cannot surrender what is not yours. And maybe that’s the point – agencies know it’s easier to sign the papers if you don’t view the baby as your own in the first place."

I love that part Heather! Exactly right!

During my pregnancy, I tried to tell myself that I was Charlie was "A's baby" as a way to try not to attach and now I know it was just a coping mechanism and only hurt myself in the long run because not bonding with my baby was impossible and I did anyways and should have just enjoyed that....
PermalinkPermalink 05/02/07 @ 13:12
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
UGH, I saw the movie "The Handmaid's Tale", it was awful, and that isn't how I see adoption.
I know my children have other mothers and I have a great deal of empathy for them. I am sorry though I can't (and won't) take any responsibility for their life situations that lead them to choose adoption. I had nothing to do with that or their ultimate decisions.
And Rosie? Not the most stellar example of adoptive mommyhood either, can't stand her. Perhaps someone put her brain in the wrong head?
PermalinkPermalink 05/02/07 @ 16:42
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
If agencies and other did not encourage the disconnections by treating the pregnant women as surrogates, I doubt it would occur to most women to have that fantasy.

I wonder if many birth mothers who refuse contact bought into the notion that their child no longer was connected to them?

Ah yes, Rosie, think Deb's right about her. Stellar celeb adoptive moms....hmmmm....still thinking.....Oh, I do like Nicole Kidman.
PermalinkPermalink 05/02/07 @ 19:11
Comment from: Chromesthesia [Member] Email
That scene in that book really was squicky.
*shudder*
And you make good points.
PermalinkPermalink 05/04/07 @ 15:45
Comment from: terri [Member] Email
I haven't been able to bring myself to read that book. Ugh. And, yes, that mindset is troublesome. I can't help but believe the child picks up on it in utero.
PermalinkPermalink 05/05/07 @ 13:03
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Categories

Misc

Subscribe to Crisis Pregnancy Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 147